Effect of pre-sowing Application of Nitrogen, Potassium and Sulfur and its relationship on Egyptian Cotton Productivity

Effect of pre-sowing Application of Nitrogen, Potassium and Sulfur and its relationship on Egyptian Cotton Productivity ( Vol-2,Issue-5,September - October 2017 )

Author: Amany A.El-Ashmouny, Kholoud A.El-Naqma, Azza A. El-Hendawy

ijeab doi crossref DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/2.5.15

Keyword: Gossypium barbadense, fertilizer management, Macronutrients, pre-sowing.

Abstract: Fertilizer use in till systems must be aligned with a correct interpretation of soil chemical attributes and cotton demands. The objectives of this work were evaluate the effect of pre-sowing application of urea, potassium and sulfate on the yield of cotton and soil chemical attributes of till cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) over two harvesting years. The experiment was arranged in complete randomized block design; the doses of an activation macronutrients were the quarter of recommended dose of them. We were applied the recommended doses of N, P,K on soil. The cotton plants in the experimental plots were manually harvested on October 25, 2015 and October 15, 2016. The soil samples were collected between cotton rows in all plots before sowing on March 27, 2015 and April 1, 2016 at depth of (0-30, 30-60 and 60-90 cm) for soil fertility analyses. -The increasing doses of N,K,S induced a higher values when we addition mixture of urea , potassium and sulfate on plant height, no. of fruiting branches, no. of open bolls before harvest, boll weight, seed cotton yield/ kentar, lint % , micronaire values and pressely values. -On the other hand, % earliness increased by control and reduced by addition the mixture of nutrients. -The mixture (N+k+S) treatment had the highest values of available N and S in the first and second respectively compared with the control treatment. -The addition of potassium Sulphate had gaven a highest values of available K in the first and second seasons respectively compared with the control treatment. -The Mixture treatment had gaven a highest values of N:K which reflected on a Lint% and seed cotton yield/fed at the first and second season , respectively -The control treatment had highest values of N: S ration which affected on seed cotton. It gave a lowest values of seed cotton yield/fed. But the treatment of mixture (N + K + S) gave moderate values of N:S ratio while it was gave a highest values of seed cotton yield / fed. -The highest values of N concentration in fourth leaf (last mature leaf) due to treatment with N (urea) in the first and second seasons. But it had gaven a lowest yield compared with the control treatments. -The highest values of K concentration led to K (potassium sulfate) treatment compared with the control in first and second seasons, respectively -The highest values of N: K ratio was obtained with N ( urea ) treatment. It led to decrease in the seed cotton yield / fed but the highest values of yield / fed was obtained when added all mineral fertilizers as a mixture in soil when N: K was as a compared on control treatments. - The second treatment which caused a highest in yield after mixture treatment was k (potassium sulphate ) , it had gaven ( 9.01 & 9.64 ) yield/fed while N:K was (0.34 & 0.32 ) in the first and second seasons respectively.

References:

[1] Akhtar, M. Ehsan., Sardar, A., Ashraf, M. M., Akhtarand, M., and Zameer khan.(2003). Effect of potash application on seed cotton yield and yield components of selected cotton varieties-1. Asian J. of plant Sci 2 (8):602-604.
[2] Ashfaq, A., Hussain, N, and Athar, M. ( 2015). Role of potassium fertilizers in plant growth, crop yield and quality fiber production of cotton-An overview. Fuuast J. Biol., 5(1):27-35.
[3] Bauer, P. J., May, O. L. and Camberato. J. J. (1998). Planting data and potassium fertility effect on cotton yield and fiber properties. J. prod. Agric. 11:415-420.
[4] Black, A. C., Evans, D. D., White, J. L., Ensminyer, E. L .and Clark, E. F. (1965).Methods of soil analyses. Soc. Agro. Ink. Madison Wiscosin USA.
[5] Cantarutti,R.B;Barros,N.F;Martinez,H.E.PNovals,R.F.Avaliacao(2007) da fertilidade do solo e recomendacao de fertilizants. In NOVAIS, R. L, F; CANTARUTTI, R,B.Vicosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia do solo , 2007 . p.769-872.
[6] Cassman, K. G., Kerby, T. A., Roberts, B. A., Bryant, D. C. and Higashi, S. L. (1990). Potassium nutrition effects on lint yield and fiber quality of Acala cotton. Crop Sci. 30:672-677.
[7] Girma, K., Teal, R. K., Freeman, K. W., Boman,R. K. and Raun,W. R. (2007). Cotton lint yield and quality as affected by application on N, P and K fertilizers. J. cotton Sci. 11:12-19.
[8] Gormus, O. and El-Sabagh, A. (2016).Effect of nitrogen and sulfur on the quality of the cotton fiber mediterranean conditions.J. of Experimental Bio. And Agric. Sci. .4(6): 662-669.
[9] Gwalhmey, X. H. C. O and Main,C. L. (2012). Sulfur effect on cotton yield components .J. of Better crops. 96(1):27-28.
[10] Jackson, M. L. (1967)." Soil Chemical Analysis " Prentic-Hall,India, New Delhi , pp: 183-203.
[11] Makhdum, M. I., Malik, M. N. A., Chaudhry, F. I. and Din, S. u. (2001). Effect of Gypsum as a Sulphur fertilizer in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production. Int. J. of Agric. & Biol. 3(4): 375-377.
[12] Mengel, K., and Kirkby, E. A. (1987). "Principles Of Plant Nutrition" .International potash Institute.
[13] Mullins, G. L., Burmester, C. H. and Reeves, D. W. (1997). cotton response to in-row subsoiling and potassium fertilizer placement in Alabama . Soil Tillage Res. 40:145-154.
[14] Nascimento, V. D., Mirandam, J. E., Malaquias, J. B., Carvalho, M. D. C. S., Lins, L. C. P. and Paniago, J. (2014). Sulphur sources on the management of Scaptocoris castanea( Hemiptera: Cydnidae ) on cotton . Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 40 (1):15-20.
[15] Nasseem, M. G. and Nasrallah, A. K. (1981). The effect of sulfur on the response of cotton to urea under alkali soil conditions in pot experiments. J. plant and soil .62 : 255-263.
[16] Rosolen and Van Mellis, (2010).N utrient deficienciess in corn, sorghums and small grains in Haward B. sprague, 25-58 Mckay, New York.
[17] Sawan, Z. M. (2006). Response of yield components, and fiber properties of Egyption cotton ( Gossypium barbadense L. ) to Nitrogen fertilization and foliar-applied potassium and Mepiquat Chloride. J. of cotton Sci .10 : 224-234.
[18] Sawan, Z. M. (2014). Cottonseed yield and its quality as affected by mineral fertilizers and plant growth retardants .j. Agric. Sci . 5 (3) : 186-209.
[19] Snedecor, G.W. and W.G.Cochran (1967): Statical methods. The Lowa state Univ.press, Ames, Lowa, USA.
[20] Tisdale, S. L., Nelson, W. L. and Beatonm J. D. (1990). "Soil Fertility And Fertilizers" .Macmillan Publishing Company New York.
[21] Twolde, H; K.R Sistani and D.E. Rowe(2005): the effect of N,P and Mg on cotton plants in different characters. Journal of plant nutraition.28 (4):605-619.
[22] Xiaoli Tian, F. M., Eneji, A. E. and Zhaohu, L. (2016). Cotton yield and potassium use efficiency as affected by potassium fertilizer management with stalks returned to field. Crop. Sci. 56: 740-746.

Cite this Article: Show All (MLA | APA | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | Bibtex)

Total View: 111 Downloads: 17 Page No: 2387-2393