Morphological Markers based Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon L.) Genotypes

Morphological Markers based Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon L.) Genotypes ( Vol-3,Issue-2,March - April 2018 )

Author: Supneet Kaur, A. K. Singh, Sreshti Bagati, Mamta Sharma, Satish Sharma

ijeab doi crossref DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/3.2.34

Keyword: Genetic diversity analysis, Morphological traits, cluster analysis, ANOVA, genetic advance.

Abstract: Assessment of genetic diversity in any crop species provides a basis for devising future strategies for crop improvement; conservation and sustainable use. An experiment consisting of 24 genotypes of Tomato was conducted during the year 2016 at the Research Farm and Molecular Biology Laboratory of School of Biotechnology, SKUAST-J, Chatha. The experiment was conducted in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with three replications in 2 rows of 5m length with spacing of 45 x 90 cm. The extent of genetic divergence /relatedness was estimated among 24 genotypes by using 11 traits viz. plant height (cm), number of branches, number of fruits per bunch, total soluble solids, flesh thickness (mm), number of locules, fruit width (cm), fruit length (cm), yield per plant (g), average fruit weight (g), number of fruits per plant. The maximum number of fruits/bunch was recorded in “Utkal Pragyan” (3.66) and the minimum number was recorded in “Swarna Sampada” (2.03). Maximum TSS(%) was recorded in DCT-1 (8.06%) and minimum TSS was recorded in “Dhanshri” (2.83%). Maximum number of fruits and yield/plant was recorded in “DCT-1” (115.33) and “Hisar Lalit” (2507.36g), respectively. The minimum number of fruits and yield/ plant was recorded in “NDT-4” (23.20) and “DCT-1” (861.40g), respectively.Mean data revealed high range for most of studied traits. Hierarchical cluster analysis allowed the assessment of similarity and clarified some of the relationships among tomato genotypes. UPGMA produced a dendrogram with two main clusters with further sub clusters. Of all the studied 24 genotypes Anand tomato and Hisar lalit were found to be most dissimilar based on UPGMA clustering. Hisar lalit was found to be most promising variety among all the genotypes for most of the traits under study, which can be used for further breeding and crop improvement programmes.


[1] Arab, L. and Steck, S. (2000). Lycopene and cardiovascular disease.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71 (Suppl.): 1691S-1695S.
[2] Barber, N.J. and Barber, J. (2002). Lycopene and prostate cancer.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease, 5: 6-12.
[3] Fraser, P., Romer, S., Shipton, C., Mills, P., Kiano, J., Misawa, N., Drake, R., Schuch, W. and Bramley, P. (2002). Evaluation of transgenic tomato plants expressing an additional phytoene synthase in a fruit-specific manner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,99(2): 1092-1097.
[4] Golani, I.J., Mehta, D.R., Purohit, V.L., Pandya, H.M. and Kanzariya, M.V. 2007.Genetic variability, correlation andpath coefficient studies in tomato.Indian Journal of Agriculture and Research, 41 (2):146 – 149.
[5] Henareh, M. 2015. Genetic Variation in Superior Tomato Genotypes Collected from North West of Iran. International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences,3(6): 0219-0225.
[6] He, C., Poysa, V. and Yu, K. 2003. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106: 363-373.
[7] Jarquin-Enriquez, L., Mercado-Silva, E.M., Maldonado, J.L. and Lopez-Baltazar, J. 2013. Lycopene content and color index of tomatoes are affected by the greenhouse cover. Scientia Horticulturae, 155: 43-48.
[8] Khadivi-Khub, A., Zamani, Z. and Bouzari, N. 2008. Evaluation of genetic diversity in some Iranian and foreign sweet cherry cultivars by using RAPD molecular markers and morphological traits.Horticulture Environment Biotechnology.49: 188-196.
[9] Singh, J. K., Singh, J. P., Jain, S. K., Aradhana, J. and Joshi, A. 2002. Studies on genetic variability and its importance in tomato (Lycopesicum esculentum Mill.).Progressive Horticulture, 34: 77-79.
[10] Shi, J., Le Maguer, M. and Bryan, M. (2002). Lycopene from tomatoes. In: Shi, J., Ghazza, Le Maguer, M. (Eds.), Funtional Foods. Biochemical and Processing Aspects, vol. 2. CRC Press, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 135-166.
[11] Shidfar, F., Froghifar, N., Vafa, M., Ajab, A.R., Hosseini, S., Shidfar, S. andGohari, M. 2011. The effects of tomato consumption on serum glucose, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I,homocysteine and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients.International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 62(3), 289-94.
[12] Wang, X.F., Knoblauch, R. and Leist, N. 2005.Varietal discrimination of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) by ultrathin-layer isoelectric focusing of seed protein. Seed Science and Technology, 28: 521–526.
[13] Ward, J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58: 236-244.
[14] Nikoumanesh, K., Ebadi, A., Zeinalabedini, M. and Gogorcena, Y. 2011. Morphological and molecular variability in some Iranian almond genotypes and related Prunus species and their potentials for rootstock breeding.Scientia Horticulturae, 129: 108-118.

Cite this Article: Show All (MLA | APA | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | Bibtex)

Total View: 28 Downloads: 3 Page No: 567-573