Author(s): Marvita Akhiri Rimbasari, Setyono Yudo Tyasmoro*, Karuniawan Puji Wicaksono, Didik Hariyono
DOI: 10.22161/ijeab.96.5
Abstract: This research aims to determine the substitution of inorganic fertilizers using organic fertilizers and biofertilizers (PGPR) in an effort to reduce farmers' dependence on inorganic fertilizers and reduce subsidized fertilizers by the government. The research method used in this research is a factorial experiment with 2 factors with 6 treatment combinations. The first factor is biofertilizer (PGPR), R0 = without PGPR, R10 = 10 liters ha-1 PGPR and the second factor is P0 (farmers' habitual fertilization (400 kg ha-1 urea + 400 kg ha-1 NPK), P1 (100% inorganic (275 kg ha-1 urea + 250 kg ha-1 NPK)), P2 (75% inorganic (206.25 kg ha-1 urea + 187,5 kg ha-1 NPK) + 25% organic (1,25 ton ha-1)) , P3 (50% inorganic (137,5 kg h-1 Urea + 125 kg ha-1 NPK) + 50% organic (2,5 ton ha-1)), P4 (25% inorganic (68,75 kg ha-1) 1 Urea + 62,5 kg ha-1 NPK) + 75% organic (3,75 ton ha-1)), P5 (100% organic fertilizer (5 ton ha-1)). Variables observed were plant length, number of tillers, grain contents per hill, weight of 1000 seeds, productivity, leaf chlorophyll content and R/C ratio. The result shows that organic fertilizer and PGPR can be used to substitute inorganic fertilizer at 25% to 50% of the recommended dose, especially in its effect on yield. Meanwhile, substitution of 75% and 100% still not shows the effective substitution.
Keywords: biofertilizer, inorganic fertilizer, organic fertilizer, rice
Article Info:
Received: 15 Sep 2024; Received in revised form: 14 Oct 2024; Accepted: 23 Oct 2024; Available online: 05 Nov 2024
| Total View: 1639 | Downloads: 740 | Page No: 030-035 | Download PDF |
Cite this Article:
APA | ACM | Chicago | Harvard | IEEE | MLA | Vancouver | Bibtex


